False Context
Real media is attached to the wrong time, place, person, or event. Trace its earliest appearance.

Mrs. Adams
Online Verification
Leave the page, investigate the source, trace claims to their origins, and decide what the evidence actually allows you to believe.
A polished website, confident explanation, viral image, or impressive citation can still mislead you. Verification begins when you look beyond the original page.
Four moves for deciding where your attention belongs.
Pause. Do you know the source? Notice whether the claim is pushing you toward an immediate emotional reaction.
Search the creator or organization. Look for reputation, expertise, ownership, funding, and previous work.
Look for credible, independent reporting or research that addresses the same claim with stronger context.
Follow quotations, statistics, images, videos, and citations back to their earliest reliable source.
You are more vulnerable to weak information when it confirms what you already believe. Slow down most when a claim makes you feel immediately vindicated, angry, frightened, or excited.
Open new tabs instead of staying inside an unfamiliar source.
Do not stop when a source includes a link or citation.
Search a distinctive phrase in quotation marks. Find the complete statement and check whether the surrounding context changes its meaning.
Locate the original report or dataset. Confirm the date, population, definitions, sample, and comparison being used.
Use reverse-image search, locate earlier appearances, identify the creator, and confirm the time, place, and event.
Open the cited study. Check that it exists, says what the source claims, and actually studied a comparable situation.
Misleading information is often built from genuine material, not a completely invented fake.
Real media is attached to the wrong time, place, person, or event. Trace its earliest appearance.
Accurate facts or visuals are framed in a way that distorts their meaning. Restore the larger trend.
Satirical material is reposted as factual information. Locate the original publisher and purpose.
Essential material is removed to create a false impression. Find the complete quotation, clip, or dataset.
Do not try to decide whether information “looks AI-generated.” AI can imitate polished writing, citations, photographs, voices, and video, and human-made content can contain the same warning signs.
Look for creator information, disclosures, publication history, AI labels, or Content Credentials.
Confirm that the source exists and that it actually supports the sentence or conclusion.
Search for earlier versions and verify who created it, when, where, and for what purpose.
Find credible evidence that does not merely repeat the same unsupported claim.
AI and context-verification concepts adapted from the News Literacy Project’s “6 Things to Know About AI” and “Detecting Tricks of Context” resources. SIFT framework developed by Mike Caulfield.
Select a situation, then choose the strongest first move.
What is the strongest first verification move?
What is the strongest first verification move?
What is the strongest first verification move?
The claim is supported by traceable, credible evidence and fits your inquiry.
The information may be useful, but it needs stronger or independent confirmation.
The origin, context, or evidence cannot be verified, or the claim is misleading.
A link is not proof, a citation is not proof, and a screenshot is not proof. Follow the trail until you reach evidence you can identify, understand, and explain.